Toronto Will Finally Get A Vacant Home Tax, After Bleeding Millennials For Years

Toronto may finally start taxing vacant homes. City of Toronto staff recommended a vacant home tax to council this week. The tax would place a penalty on those that use residential property in the City for less than half the year. By doing so, the City hopes to join other major cities like Paris in curbing housing speculation. This comes after Toronto has been bleeding millennials for years, as housing affordability reaches crisis levels.

Toronto’s Vacant Home Problem Is Forcing Millennials Out 

Toronto is becoming a place to park money in real estate, as young adults abandon the City. We pointed out in 2017, much to denial of the City, that tens of thousands of homes were vacant or scarcely used. Shortly after, the City’s own report found over 10,000 units were almost never used. This has made a sharp contribution to the City’s affordability crisis.

The affordability crisis has actually resulted in a negative flow of young adults. These key consumers to urban areas, tend to drive many of the creative and hospitality industries that make cities livable. As Toronto bleeds them to smaller regions and the suburbs, it sets itself up for long-term damage. This trend is likely to have accelerated during the pandemic, as Toronto’s suburbs became buying hot spots.

Toronto Net Intraprovincial Migration

More people are leaving Toronto for other (cheaper) parts of Ontario.

Source: Statistics Canada, Better Dwelling.

Toronto’s Vacant Home Tax Proposed At 1%

City staff officially recommended Toronto adopt a vacant home tax. The tax would start at 1% of the assessed value of homes used less than six months per year. The proposed starting rate would be almost double the rate of the city’s 0.599704% property tax rate. It’s likely to sting speculators sitting on vacant property, but not eliminate them. Vancouver recently raised its vacant home tax to 3%, to try and encourage a further reduction. The idea is to provide a penalty large enough to make vacant speculation unprofitable. 

Toronto Targets Vacant Home Taxes For 2022

The City is giving speculators plenty of time to liquidate, which will reduce the number of vacant homes by implementation. By the end of Q2 2021, the City should have the framework designed and ready to go. They’re proposing a target roll out for the 2022 tax year. The report estimates one percent of housing stock subject to the tax, would generate between $55 and $66 million in gross tax revenue annually. Yes, one percent of housing stock – more than rental vacancy in some years.

Toronto’s vacant homeowners will have more than enough time to liquidate, and avoid being hit with the tax. Just by existing, this is likely to promote a more efficient use of housing supply. This should help ease demand over the next couple of years. Although whether it’s too late to reverse the outflow remains to be seen. Millennials still have to pick between the vacant tiny boxes the City built for AirBnB, or spacious suburbs to work their now remote jobs. 

Like this post? Like us on Facebook for the next one in your feed.



We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • Reply
    Ian 4 years ago

    3 years late, but better than never. Now to make sure they give everyone enough time so the true extent of the problem is never known.

    • Reply
      Steve 4 years ago

      Match Vancouver and go straight to 3% it’s crazy not to… then match NZ and only allow citizens/residents to buy property.

      While we currently don’t have enough housing for locals, why should we be a parking spot for global money? There are too many members of government, that are far too cozy with real estate developers.

      • Reply
        Pepp 4 years ago

        Please organize a protest for this, I mean it. I will join.

      • Reply
        Scott 4 years ago

        Good idea but it would never fly especially with the the Ontario Developers Association in charge of the government. They want to keep building safety deposit boxes. Wouldn’t be surprised if it hey vetoed Toronto’s vacancy tax…

      • Reply
        DWAYNE NEWMAN 3 years ago

        You can not buy real-estate as a foreigner “alone” (because you need to partner with a citizen) In china, India, In Canada we let our government “game” real-estate as a tax revenue generator, regardless where the property owner lives

  • Reply
    question guy 4 years ago

    This is RIDICULOUS. This will solve NOTHING.
    It will also cost too much to enforce.

    If someone chooses to keep their place empty, so be it – they are still paying taxes and utilities.

    • Reply
      Luigi Vampa 4 years ago

      The outrage! How many empty properties do you have lying around? Serious question.

    • Reply
      Elle 4 years ago

      Agreed. Already wrote to my council rep to voice my concerns. The “eat the rich” divisiveness needs to stop.

  • Reply
    janice dickson 3 years ago

    Covid-19 is causing rent prices to plummet. There’s more affordable rentals than I have ever seen in the last 10 years. Perhaps we should have COVID-20, COVID 21, COVID 22 and so on. That even better than vacancy tax.

  • Reply
    Dan 1 year ago

    This vacancy tax should apply to Foreign investors only, Residents of Ontario that do not wish to speculate in the stock market or place there after tax dollars in a low interest account, have the right to choose where their funds are placed to sustain their retirement. Retirement age people do not have the luxury of time. If the government is looking to assist housing to recoup 66 million dollars, perhaps refraining from sending millions of dollars in weapons and support to countries who engage in war, and unethical laws.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *