Canadian Borrowers To Feel Bank of Canada’s QT In 2025: NBF

Canada’s central bank is still trying to reel in the mass liquidity injections it made in 2020. A new report from National Bank of Canada (NBF) explains they see quantitative tightening (QT) making progress in 2025. The Bank of Canada (BoC) policy reverses liquidity introduced during quantitative ease (QE) in 2020, and will raise borrowing costs as the credit supply shrinks. QT has been conducted for nearly 3 years now, but the drawdown of the Government of Canada (GoC) settlement accounts means the liquidity shrinkage will finally begin to “bite” in 2025, warns the bank. 

What Is Quantitative Tightening?

Quantitative tightening (QT) is an unconventional monetary policy tool for tightening liquidity. It’s related to a term you’re likely familiar with—quantitative ease (QE). In fact, QT is the exact opposite of QE and used to reverse the liquidity injected by the central bank, especially in mortgage markets. 

The central bank’s primary objective is inflation control, primarily via interest rates. When inflation is too low, they lower rates to stimulate borrowing & demand, hoping to intentionally overrun supply and raise inflation. When inflation is too high, they raise interest rates to slow borrowing and demand, helping to slow inflation. When rates are close to 0% and can’t be lowered much further, central banks have begun to use tools like QE. 

To execute QE, the BoC competitively purchases bonds to drive prices higher, and yields lower. By essentially flooding the market with credit, they inflate the supply and drive costs lower. In Canada, it’s felt primarily in the 5-year Government of Canada bond yield, which influences 5-year fixed rate mortgages. The bonds are added to the BoC’s balance sheet, leading to balance sheet expansion. It’s the modern day equivalent of printing money, though the BoC hates when that term is used since there’s no printer. Money server goes brrr isn’t as catchy though. 

Once the liquidity event is over, they need to use QT to reverse the QE liquidity. To shrink its balance sheet, the BoC will either sell the bonds it bought or let them “roll off,” which means mature without replacement. The reduced liquidity means higher borrowing costs, which slows borrowing without any changes to interest rates. 

If a lack of liquidity was a fire, QE would be like a fire extinguisher—if used early on, it doesn’t burn your house down. QT is like refilling the fire extinguisher so you can fight the next fire. 

All of those 5-year bonds bought during QE? It’s 2025, so they’re going to start rolling off soon. Where does the time go?! 

Canada QT Progress Has Been Minor, But Expected To Pick Up Soon

Canada has gone through an epic QE binge, and it’s been struggling to reverse liquidity. The BoC balance sheet had $105 billion in assets at the start of 2020, surging 330% to ~$450 billion at its peak at the end of 2021. Since QT kicked off nearly 3 years ago, that amount has been halved (~$230 billion), but there’s still a long way to go. It hasn’t been discussed as upward pressure on rates yet, but that’s expected to change this year. 

“QT is likely to run its course in 2025,” explains Taylor Schleich, an economist at NBF. Adding, “On one hand, if we are already at or near the steady state, we should see repo and receiver general auction usage climb higher as bond run-off drains liquidity further.” 

In plain English, the BoC’s easing of liquidity will require more debt at market. That issue is further complicated by the drawdown of cash balances from the GoC’s settlement accounts. Any uncovered funding will have to seek public market debt, once again adding more demand when fewer investors are seeking to buy bonds. 

“The government’s bank account is now back to its pre-COVID size so spending can’t come out of cash balances,” explains Schleich. 

That’s a real doozie of a setup from Canada. The best-case scenario is the economy keeps humming along, and the cost of borrowing begins to rise for medium-term lending. The worst case is that rising unemployment and slowing GDP growth have already begun to appear, meaning the next round of stimulus may be needed before the normalization is complete. More bluntly, that fire extinguisher may not be refilled before it burns our house down. 

8 Comments

COMMENT POLICY:

We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • Reply
    Ellyn D’Uva 7 days ago

    This isn’t fair and Canada MUST support borrowers and homeowners with support.
    Please donate.

  • Reply
    gyula huszar 7 days ago

    Pretty soon the most important thing will be having steady work and low debt. Fair or not, this is the inevitable result of governments spending out of control and piling debt on top of debt.

    • Reply
      EnglishInCanada 7 days ago

      As a saver, why must I support other people’s out of control borrowing?

  • Reply
    Usman Mohammed 7 days ago

    Toronto is the next New York. Buy now or forever be homeless. Even a studio condo will be worth $10 million in 5 years.

  • Reply
    Brett weir 7 days ago

    Sell.our homes to Muslims and head to Latin America at 60..and get a 25 year old beauty who looks amazing and not weigh more then these fat add women

    • Reply
      peter 2 hours ago

      can a 60 year old even keep up with a 25 year old beauty? sex toys would have to include a defib . but hey we all want to die happy!

  • Reply
    Jason Azevedo 1 day ago

    Home hoarders and people trying to get rich off real estate created this mess. People in life are impatient and it shows. Whether it be on the highway or in finance people are impatient and Fomo is a mofo. Half the blame is on the government but the people took the bait hook line and sinker. And the people responsible will point the finger at someone else. And when the crash really settles in they will blame the government or immigrants rather not themselves. The crash will come on from high unemployment from too much money going to pay off debt.

  • Reply
    endneoliberalism 14 hours ago

    Lol far-right lunatic losing their minds here. Cry harder. Endless tax cuts for corporate Canada and the uber elite is what’s driving up our debt, not spending. We need more revenues to tackle our problems. More trickle down economics won’t fix the problems it’s created.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *