Canada is using public spending to mask private sector weakness, and the bill won’t stop at taxes. A new National Bank of Canada (NBC) report warns public investment is growing at over twice the rate of overall GDP. It’s also fueling more borrowing, lifting the benchmark rate that impacts borrowing costs for everything from government debt to your mortgage. Recently more of that spending has been directed into capital projects, including defence—but swapping payroll for weapons doesn’t exactly turn that debt into productive growth. Until weapons start making weapons, anyway.
Canadian Public Investment Growth More Than Double Overall GDP
Over the past decade, government spending has grown much faster than the broader economy. To illustrate the gap, the bank focuses on the “G” in GDP—government consumption and fixed capital investment. Sluggish private investment has been flat-to-negative in GDP, made up by state spending. Over the past 3 years, public sector fixed capital investment advanced at a 3.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), over double the 1.7% CAGR that general GDP has seen. The bank’s index chart shows this wasn’t a long-term trend so much as a post-pandemic shift where public spending filled the gap left by weak private investment.
“Canadian government expenditures have decisively outpaced broader economic growth over the past decade,” writes the bank.
Canada’s Public Spending Is Hiding Its Private Sector Pain
The share of GDP driven by government spending has climbed sharply in recent years. Before 2020, it was rare to see government spending represent more than 25% of total GDP, only seen during extreme downturns like the Global Financial Crisis and the pandemic. Post-pandemic, the share fell towards the historic norm until 2022, when it began to rapidly climb. The Canadian economy is now reliant on government to represent over a quarter of total GDP. The shift occurred before the trade shock.
The divergence between Canada and the US in the above chart turns more surprising when broken down. Since 2022, Canada’s trailed in major GDP components, with non-residential business investment being one of the more concerning lines.
“… government expenditure growth is the only area where Canada holds a relative edge when compared to the U.S. GDP picture, where growth in other components are much more impressive south of the border,” explains NBC. “Thankfully, the share of Canadian ‘G’ allocated to fixed capital (as opposed to consumption) is growing.”
Canada’s Public Debt Still Growing: Swapping Workers For Weapons
Let’s circle back to the composition of state spending, and what that means. Government consumption is spending for day-to-day operations (e.g. payroll). Fixed-capital formation is spending for infrastructure, a term that’s increasingly lost meaning, but traditionally includes things like roads, hospitals, and military capacity. The latter is doing the heavy lifting.
Program spending is forecast to slow sharply, from 8.1% CAGR over the past 10 years to just 0.5% through 2029-30, with workforce reductions playing a key role. Meanwhile, capital outlays—such as buying weapons—have grown to fill that gap, and then some.
Canada’s Plan Will Cost You More—and Not Just In Taxes
Credit is a market-based system, where supply and demand determine cost. When borrowing demand outstrips available capital, lenders want higher yields. When there is excess capital, borrowing becomes cheaper to encourage demand. Since government bond yields set the benchmark price for everything from business loans to mortgages, Ottawa’s spending spree doesn’t just raise the tax burden—it raises all borrowing costs. That means more pressure on housing demand, private investment, and other rate-sensitive parts of growth.
NBC warns it won’t be cheap. “Expansionary policy, like in the U.S., is set to keep the sovereign yield curve at relatively steeper levels,” notes the bank. Their analysis also highlights that the fiscal load is increasingly shifting to provinces, which are expected to drive the borrowing shortfall into 2026.
Yields rise no matter who is doing the borrowing, but the bank argues this mix matters. Investors tend to be more forgiving when debt funds long-term productive assets instead of day-to-day operations. NBC adds that, “Over time, higher defence expenditures could help re‑energize Canada’s manufacturing base, which has steadily lost global relevance.”
However, the improvement the bank points to isn’t the same as solving the problem. It’s more like taking a punch to the stomach instead of the groin—less painful, but still painful. Defence manufacturing offers some short-term relief, but it still depends heavily on government demand rather than market-driven growth. Without a private sector base strong enough to sustain it, the result is just creating a larger liability for the public to pay. Plus interest.




The problem is other than finance people no one understands any of this. The government and quasi govt (banks, insurance, telecomm, media, etc) are parasitic. They dont create any gdp, they just take from the priductive sectors and redistribute.
So since 2015, canada has seen govt wipe out productive investment, and industry, and try to replace that with govt and quasi gpvt jobs? The reason everyone is now poor is not because of trump, or anything else, its exactly this. Even ifngovt could choose to invest efficiently (which clearly the current govt cant do) the driving away of private investment will still kill our economy.
For example, driving off pipeline and oild development nog only cost us 80b to biild a 7b pipeline, but also drove most of our drilling, manufacturing and exploration companies to the usa. Those guys arent coming back, and now carney wants to export energy, but doesnt have a port, a road or rail to do it? So he is going to spend 90b on a train from montreal to toronfo, via ottawa? Why not invest in upgrading our rail abd port facilities on the pacific?
Trump recently not only made a trade deal with japan, but got them to invest 1tr in us oil and gas companies? Wasnt japan here asking trudeau for a deal?
So basically in additopn to wasting trillions on nonsense, the liberals have and continue to hamstring us for decades to come? Even worse, our minister of foreign affairs is letting doug ford make trade policy in front of her, ehile mexico negotiates a new mus trade agreemenr, hoping to pull another freeland and get added in at fhe last minute?
My biggest concern is the sheer number ofnpeople in this country who believe cafney is doing a ‘good’ job. This.is a complete disaster.
So many other areas Canada could be using capital like expanding healthcare facilities, creating more research facilities, solar & wind electrical generation, battery storage parks, etc.
Where goes capital used for defence? To USA?
Cutting a deal to build/assemble parts of the Gripen here might be a small benefit to some citizens.
But more likely most money will end up in the hands of Brookfield or similar.
And higher borrowing costs will push forced sales that result in more real estate owned by investors.
It would be interesting to see a study of people with economics degrees that determines what percentage of them doubt the veracity of what they were taught.
I would suggest taht government spending regardless of use is a negative on the economy and pocket book of every citizen.
Return powers to the provinces and then have the provinces return that power to the municipalities. Allow more oversight by citizens as to how their money will be spent … AND reduce how much money the governmet has control of.
Spending power should be reserved for those who have earned it, not those who steal it cause ‘ma democracy’.
Democracy is 2 groups arguing how stolen money should be spent. I’ll pass and spend my own money thanks.