The Bank of Canada Needs To Halt Stimulus, Or It Will Jeopardize The Recovery: NBC

The Canadian economy is quickly going from a recovery to overstimulated. That was the take from the National Bank of Canada (NBC) today, anyway. In an unusual move, the Big Six bank wrote an open letter demanding a halt to stimulus. They also argue that the central bank needs to hike rates in the next few weeks or risk undermining the recovery.

Canada No Longer Needs Extraordinary Stimulus

The Big Six bank argues the central bank is indulging in cheap and reckless growth that’s no longer needed. Most key indicators show the economy is well into a recovery. Some indicators are even better than pre-pandemic, but monetary policy is still loose. The risk has officially gone from deflation to inflation from easy monetary policy.

“Let us be blunt: Having achieved full employment, Canada no longer requires extraordinarily stimulative monetary policy,” wrote the bank. Adding, “… maintaining such a loose policy standing much longer risks compromising Canada’s longer-term economic and financial market prospects…” 

The Bank of Canada Should Stop Stimulus and Halt Rates

The BoC isn’t just keeping rates low; they’re also still delivering billions in stimulus to the economy. The BoC has hinted they’ll halt stimulus in the next few months. Sometime between April and September 2022, they see a rate hike. That’s too late, says the Big Six, who thinks the central bank doesn’t appreciate reality.

The economists are calling on the BoC to use its final meeting this year to set expectations. The last meeting of the year is coming up next Wednesday. Squandering this opportunity can lead to adding even more risk into the system. 

“Use Wednesday’s rate announcement to telegraph a possible normalization of monetary policy in the first quarter of the New Year, implementing the first of multiple interest rate hikes no later than March,” they wrote. 

Employment and Housing Are Becoming Overstimulated

The BoC has been helping set expectations, just in the other direction. If you’ve been following the data, you might have noticed that’s not the case. The head of the central bank even began to dismiss the reliability of their own research at some point. Not because they find it unreliable or anything. There’s no conflicting research — it appears it’s solely due to it not agreeing with the Governor’s narrative. His narrative is a muddled take that even he fails to communicate effectively

“The national unemployment [rate] back down to 6% — a level that would have been considered at or perhaps below NAIRU in pre-COVID days, as per Bank of Canada published research,” highlight’s the economists. 

For those not fluent in bankster, NAIRU is short for the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment. It’s the level of employment before the job market becomes so tight that it drives wages higher. BMO also recently pointed out the last time Canada hiked rates, unemployment was at this level. That occurred in 2017, when the overnight rate was also significantly higher.

Not convinced employment is overheated? How about housing? “You may prefer to look past our notoriously choppy jobs data. Perhaps you go in for housing data. Well then, you’re likely reading about a reacceleration in activity and downright steamy price gains in key markets,” wrote the economists.  

The Canadian real estate discussion focuses mainly on supply but rarely demand. Arguably, BoC rolled out policies to help stimulate home buying when they thought sales would fall. Sales didn’t fall. After a year of record home sales, they’re only ending one program to ease demand. 

The program only ended last month, and has yet to see trickle down to consumers. BMO estimates excess home sales hit 6% of GDP due to monetary stimulus. That’s just the extra home sales — with the biggest beneficiary being investors

Central banks lower rates and use stimulus to create demand. If the demand rises to the point of driving inflation, they’re supposed to raise rates to throttle credit. “For a Canadian economy proving so resilient, with jobs so plentiful and inflation so elevated, the time is nigh for demand to be calmed,” said the bank.



We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • V 3 years ago

    They have destroyed the dream of home ownership for so many, dispicible!

  • Arthur 3 years ago

    Thanks NBC for your frankness.
    Some would say that utilizing “extraordinarily stimulative monetary policy’ during a transient pandemic event was also unwise. Stepping on the gas after you activate all the brakes and chain the vehicle up doesn’t get you too far.
    BofC should now be in a position, with hindsight, to assess their stimulus actions while the federal, provincial and local governments and businesses were necessarily shutting down the economy. Really is it a surprise that real estate became the pressure release for all that BofC economic growth strategy? Come on BofC let us know how you rate your performance!

  • Kristina King 3 years ago

    Very interesting and nice to hear some sanity in the insane environment. Hopefully the letter is taken into account at the upcoming meeting but unfortunately I highly doubt it 🙁
    I am wondering though where I can find this open letter? I have not been able to find anything on this other than this article??

    Thanks so much


    • Arthur 3 years ago

      It is posted in the National Bank’s website under:
      Economics Analysis
      Market View
      Titled: Op-ed: For the BoC, promises were made to be broken

      • Felix 3 years ago

        One of the things that irks me is they email the content to journalists first, and then post it on their site the next day.

        I didn’t really notice this until I realized some content later in the day references the next day, and lo and behold — the report is published after.

Comments are closed.