Canada

RBC Leaves A Laundry List of Reasons Canadian Real Estate Is “Far From Risk-Free”

Canada’s largest bank sees a lot of risk in real estate, just not where other people may see it. RBC Senior Economist Robert Hogue published a list of risks that may impact real estate markets near-term. The bank feels government aid kept prices moving higher, but the market is “far from risk free.” Here’s some of the issues they feel could cool the market, but won’t necessarily impact prices. 

Higher Interest Rates

At the top of the economist’s list is a risk that occurs if the economy does well – interest rates rise. Low rates provided a “powerful tailwind” to send prices higher. Hogue feels higher rates may reverse some of that power, if they rise faster than expected. Some investors already feel this is occurring.

The Government May Be Pressured To Intervene

RBC also sees faster home price gains may lead the government to intervene in the market. The economist mentions B.C.’s measures in 2016 and Ontario’s measures in 2017, as examples. It was thought to be unlikely for either government to do anything during this period.

Reduced Immigration May Last Longer Than Expected

Falling immigration rates are another risk the economist sees, especially in major markets. Hogue believes if slow immigration persists longer than expected, the impact will spread beyond the rental market. More specifically, this would impact condo apartments in their opinion.

Prolonged Elevation of Unemployment

Oddly, high unemployment isn’t a risk on the way up, but the economist believes it can be a risk if it persists too long. Hogue states, “high unemployment could outlast government support, potentially undermining housing demand.”  

Pandemic Variants

There are risks that new variants of the virus could emerge, rolling back “progress.” Hogue said this could be “destabilizing to any recovery.” It’s unclear why initial setbacks are bullish for real estate, but additional setbacks wouldn’t be. It’s the easiest way to get a round of stimmy, although you’d be dealing with weaker loonies. 

Poor affordability 

lol.Yeah, it’ll be a real risk if that happens. 

Like this post? Like us on facebook for the next one in your feed.

3 Comments

COMMENT POLICY:
We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • Erik 9 months ago

    The economy is doing well is bad for housing is peak mismanagement.

  • Man 9 months ago

    RBC bank did the largest chunk of mortgage during the previous quarter and now they see risk.
    Only God know what is happening.

  • Derek Pandke 9 months ago

    This fear of “missing out” is driving more and more people to borrow even more and become even more indebted. Why would you stretch your limits on borrowing just to be in a home? This is a tremendous drag on productivity. With these highly speculative markets people are going to have to accept that homes do not always increase in value. Yearly increases of 5 or 10 percent are not sustainable. CMHC is allowing banks and private lending to take on far more risk because they guarantee the mortgages (well the tax payer does) We have to stop saying Canada is different than elsewhere.

Comments are closed.