China Deployed 3 Tricks To Curb Real Estate Speculation, And Canada Should Follow

China Deployed 3 Tricks For Curbing Real Estate Speculation, And Canada Should Follow

Canadian real estate has been roaring higher, and it’s being complicated by low interest rates and speculators. The government rolled out some measures designed to cool the market, but they mostly target foreign buyers. This is just a band-aid solution. Domestic speculators will continue to be an issue and it’s just a matter of time before foreign buyers find a loophole. As long as cheap credit remains, speculators will continue to drive the market, making housing less and less affordable for those least able to afford it. So what’s the solution? Here’s three moves China’s using to cool their market, making it damn near impossible to speculate in their hottest markets.

Higher Down Payments… That Get Higher

Rather than lowering down payment requirements to pump the market, China increased down payment requirements. This year the government increased the minimum downpayment for a mortgage to 35% on your first home. Want a second home? Your down payment on that second place is going to be a minimum of 60%. If that home is larger than 140 square meters (1,500 sqft), you’ll need an 80% down payment. China is choosing to restrict demand by placing more down payment barriers for those that might be looking to speculate.

Canada sees an increased demand for buying homes, and somehow feels we should make it easier on buyers. In Canada, you can secure your first home for as little as 5% down, and the BC government will even pitch in with an interest free down payment loan. Canadian governments see increased home sales as tax revenue, so they aren’t interested in slowing it down. If we have too many buyers, why are we focused on putting more in the market?

China Says No Flipping… And They’re Serious

For just a few thousand dollars, you can play pre-sale condo roulette. The game is easy. You put 5% down, and then try to sell it for more than you paid before the next 5% is due. If you fail, you’ve got to put in another 5% or take the loss. If you win, you get to make a leveraged increase. It’s way too easy, and it adds a huge amount of markup from what the developer is selling a home for, and the profit your speculators are looking to make. China is curbing this by creating a mandatory lockup period.

Mandatory holding requirements have rolled out across China’s hottest markets. In order to ensure that speculators don’t buy into apartment complexes, they’re making it unprofitable to hold. Buyers of pre-sales in 8 cities – Nanchang,  Xi’an, Chongqing, Nanning, Changsha, Guiyang, Shijiazhuang and Wuhan all have minimum holding periods after buying. Buyers of new homes in Nanchang need to hold their apartment for 2 years after the building completes. Buyers of pre-sales in Shijiazhuang need to hold on for 5 years before reselling. This makes buying and holding these assignments much more risky. If the market starts to tank, they’ll have to make payments for two whole years before they can sell at a loss. More risk for speculators, more units for people that want to live in these homes. Similar plans are being discussed by the Beijing municipal government, for new developments.

China Deployed 3 Tricks For Curbing Real Estate Speculation, And Canada Should Follow - Chongqing
Chongqing luxury home prices, after restrictions placed in 2017 Q2. Luxury markets usually lead the general market in increases and drops. Source: Savills.

Limiting Amortization

China is cooling mortgage demand by shortening the maximum amortization to 25 years. Sales surged at 30 year amortizations, so to reduce buyers they dropped the maximum to 25 years. This reduces both the amount of interest paid, and your ability to absorb higher payments by term lengthening.

Canada does the opposite, and longer amortizations are becoming increasingly popular in places like Vancouver. During the 2008 – 2009 peak, Canada briefly lengthened the maximum amortization to 40 years. In places like Vancouver, credit unions regularly offer 35 year amortizations. When stress testing was announced across all mortgages at federally regulated banks, we saw brokers saying, it’s not a problem because you can lengthen your amortization.

Rather than reigning in the amount people are borrowing, Canada actually facilitates larger and larger debt loads. This makes it much easier for you to pay more than twice the sticker price of a home, without even noticing. It also makes it much easier for inexperienced buyers to get caught up in spending way more than they can actually afford.

China’s Laser Focus On Solving Speculation

China has a unique perspective on real estate speculation, due to the fact they have no foreign buyers, and don’t have to appease voters. Without foreign buyers, there’s no way to blame someone else as to why you paid 30% over ask. Foreign buyers show up to sell you s**t, at a markup, because they know you’ll pay it. Once they disappear, someone local will be willing to sell you the same s**t, at a mark up – because you’re willing to pay it. Solving external speculative capital slows down the process, but it doesn’t solve it.

Not having to pander to voters allows China to focus on the issue, rather than trying to please a voting base. In this case, they’re tackling demand. Everyone needs shelter, not everyone needs to own a home. When there are too many homebuyers, they make it harder for people to purchase. You manage markets by increasing the difficulty of obtaining supply, not by adding more buyers to the pool. The latter only creates more incentive to lower supply, to extract a maximum of capital from whoever can borrow the most.

We know, you have *no* idea what to get us for Christmas. Why not donate some cash to the Ontario SPCA or the BC SPCA instead? Every dollar helps!



We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • Peter G. 6 years ago

    We would never ban pre-sale flippers. The developers run this country, and are a huge source of political donations. They wouldn’t bite the hands that feed them.

  • Trader Jim 6 years ago

    The ship’s sailed on longer amortizations here. People think low interest rates are the problem, but they’re only an issue when amortizations are long. Theoretically, you should be shortening the amort, giving people more free cash flow (to pay principal down), but not increasing the amount of debt they can assume.

    That’s why this GDP growth should be viewed with a huge amount of skepticism. If it’s debt fueled, they’re borrowing today’s growth from the future.

  • Diane 6 years ago

    Banning people from selling for a mandatory period seems like good business. No one buying for a legitimate purpose would need to sell in less than two years. That would also solve all of those oversea students that go to school here for a year, buy, then drop out.

  • MH 6 years ago

    Thanks. It’s hard to argue with these points. The only thing in question here is political will to implement them.

  • Alistair McLaughlin 6 years ago

    I’ve always felt that 20% down and max 25 years amortization should be the most generous terms under which anyone could/should buy a home. Also, lenders should shoulder the risk; CMHC should not and would not exist under the minimum 20% down scenario. It would have no reason for existing if high ratio mortgages did not exist.

  • JR 6 years ago

    I’ve always wondered why we don’t cooperate with the Chinese government in cutting down money laundering. The Chinese government wants to catch those gangsters fleeing the country with ill gotten gains stolen from the Chinese people and we don’t want that money here propping up the property market.

  • Tommy 6 years ago

    If all those rules were implemented in Canada, the entire economy would tank and never recover. Nobody would ever be able to afford to buy in Toronto/Vancouver.

    • Mark Sibthorpe 6 years ago

      I think the point is to discourage speculation in real-estate. Having cash tied up in homes also makes us noncompetitive and makes retirement risky for many.

  • Justin Thyme 6 years ago

    There is political will, and there is political will not.

  • Jon 6 years ago

    Should be limited to owning just one house per family in key markets. Temporary global population explosion shouldn’t be taken advantage of any more than water during a heat wave.

Comments are closed.