Low Interest Rates Funnel Money To The Rich, Shows Central Bank Research

Low interest rates help to bring working and middle-class prosperity. Inequality will drop if only people could borrow more years of their income today. At least that’s the narrative society was sold on for the past 100 years. It turns out there’s no evidence to show that’s true. In fact, the evidence indicates it was an outright lie.

De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) researchers studied the impact of falling interest rates on wealth. The researchers found low interest rates allow the rich to capture a greater share of the economy. It may produce a small wealth bump for middle-class folks with assets, but they were worse off than before. The gap between the rich became even wider, producing greater inequality.

Conversely, they found the opposite was also true. Raising interest rates helped to reverse the share of wealth held by top incomes. But you totally don’t want to do that, because of some reason a super-rich person told you. Let’s take a quick dive into the numbers.

Lowering Interest Rates Help The Rich Capture Up To 6% More of A Country’s Wealth

The Dutch central bank studied twelve advanced economies from 1920 to 2015. The 95 years of data show low interest rates result in the rich getting a bigger share of a country’s wealth. Most of this occurs as a result of low interest rates helping to produce much higher asset prices.

The top ten percent of households captured a significantly larger share of wealth. They found a more “potent” impact in the tails of the income distribution. In other words, higher wealth brackets received a bigger share of the cut of total wealth. 

It gets really big at the top of the income distribution too. The study found the top one-percent of incomes capture one to six percent more of the national wealth. Since the impact was higher at the tails, the top 0.1% got a bigger cut than the rest. Researchers suggest central banks become more aware of their contribution to wealth inequality. After all, they are one of the biggest drives of it.

Higher Interest Rates Lower The Share of Wealth Held By The One-Percent

The average person is largely convinced higher interest rates are bad for them. If the cost of debt rises, they have to spend more to service it. However, the central bank found it helped to reverse the share of wealth held by the one-percent. In other words, people may pay a few more dollars on a loan, but the wealth inequality is smaller. That person paying a slightly higher interest rate sees an increased quality of life. Of course, many people don’t care about their qualify of life. They just want to have slightly more money than their friends and neighbors.

The research is unlikely to shock anyone in finance that’s picked up a book in the past 10 years. It may come as a surprise to the general population though. They’ve been sold on the narrative lower interest rates will boost their wealth. By borrowing future income on the cheap, they can spend more on things today. Those things are generally sold by wealthier people. Middle-class people get access to more debt, and the rich collect that debt. Super complicated and difficult to understand, apparently.

Most people are so fixated on earning a couple of extra dollars, they are unaware of their relative position. Sure, low interest rates give a teardown bungalow you bought for $200,000 a price tag of $2.4 million in just a few years. However, you’re still living in a teardown bungalow. Meanwhile, a rich person now lives in a home with an 8-digit price tag.

Like this post? Like us on Facebook for the next one in your feed. 



We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • Trader Jim 3 years ago

    I felt uncomfortable learning this. I think we should cut interest rates, so we can all feel a little more relief.

    • LT 3 years ago

      Kind of gloomy in Toronto. Can we cut interest rates so people can buy some vitamin D?

      • RW 3 years ago

        Store beside me was out of vitamin D. Can we double cut interest rates, so I can buy some extra gas money? The Hurcan only gets 12 mpg.

        • Smaug 3 years ago

          I suggest an 84 month finance term at 0% for a bottle of Vitamin D. Why can we finance cars and houses but not vitamins that keep us healthy? IS THERE NO JUSTICE IN THIS WORLD????

  • Ahmed 3 years ago

    You mean the guys in charge of ensuring the banks have unhindered access to money have lied to us?

    This can’t be. My world is shattered. Does anyone want a loan?

  • Trader Jim 3 years ago

    Jokes aside, cheap capital is great if you know what to do with it. The problem is central banks have the situation in reverse. It’s not about growing the economy, it’s about ensuring the right amount of inflation is produced.

    Even if it’s the right amount of inflation, you have no idea where it’s coming from. Gasoline could spike 50% and make enough inflation. Mission accomplished? I’ve never seen such a poorly pitched charade that’s widely accepted.

    • Dave 3 years ago

      I have, every day I hear poorly pitched charades, problem is, their widely accepted. If it works, why change it. Ah, the question is, who’s gonna change it and who is it working for?
      I rest me case!

  • TM 3 years ago

    Ummm – this completely misrepresents the paper. Yes, the paper found that low interest rates increase the wealth of the top 1%. But it also found that raising interest rates, while reducing the wealth of the top 1%, 0.1%, 0.01%, increases inequality overall, and funnels wealth to the top 2% – 9% of society.

    “First, a positive interest rate shock reduces the shares of national income held by the top 1, 0.1 and 0.01 per cent, while its effect on the bottom 9 per cent of the top decile (which mainly consists of highly salaried workers) is positive. Second, monetary tightening increases the Gini index, meaning that the drop in the top percentile shares is likely to be smaller than the decline in the bottom income shares.”

    A cursory look @ history (going back to Volcker times) seems to show that is indeed the case.

Comments are closed.