Canadian Unemployment Claims Rip To 2008 High, Disqualifications Soar

Canada’s tight labor market is getting more questionable with each data release. Statistics Canada (Stat Can) data reveals employment insurance (a.k.a. unemployment) claims jumped in July. Excluding the pandemic, the country hasn’t seen this many claims since 2008. The surge occurred alongside a major uptick in claim disqualifications.

Canada Has Seen A Major Uptick In Unemployment Claims

Employment insurance claims are ripping higher, especially for the time of year. Claims rose 9.6% from last year, hitting a whopping 404k initial claims and renewals in July. Prior to 2020, claims were last this high in December 2008. 

More Canadians Are Seeking Unemployment Benefits

New claims and renewal for employment insurance benefits in July of each year.

Source: Statistics Canada; Better Dwelling. *Data unavailable as program temporarily replaced with CERB due to the pandemic.

A Tight Labor Market That Resembles A Recession

The nearly 10-point annual growth observed is unusually high for the month. Excluding 2020, the last July to climb this much was back in 2016, post-Oil Patch recession. There’s a big difference between then and now though—this isn’t a recession. In theory, Canada is just above its record low unemployment. It’s an unusual combination, to say the least. 

Canadian Unemployment Claims Are Showing Recession-Like Growth In A “Tight” Market

Annual percentage growth for employment insurance claims for July of each year. 

Source: Statistics Canada; Better Dwelling. *Data unavailable as program temporarily replaced with CERB due to the pandemic, making 2022 growth unobtainable. 

Canada Is Disqualifying More People From Unemployment Benefits

Claim disqualification is also on the rise, making the issue even stranger. Over the past year, there was a 52.2% increase to 98k disqualified claims in July. Prior to 2020, it was the most claims for a July since 1993, and the highest growth since 1973. Something is brewing, and it doesn’t sound like good news. 

Canada Disqualified The Most Employment Insurance Claims of Any July Since 1993

Canadian disqualified employment insurance claims for July of each year.

Source: Statistics Canada; Better Dwelling. *Data unavailable as program temporarily replaced with CERB due to the pandemic.

Claim disqualification occurs for various reasons, from being employed to failing documentation. The largest share is a mystery, with 2 in 5 disqualified claims due to “other reasons.” The highest growth reason is that the applicant was still employed, rising 557% from last year. Yes, it’s nearly 6x the volume of last July, and 5x the amount in 2019.

An uptick in this area is easy to dismiss as just fraud, but it may reveal a little more. Households may need more money to meet their cost of living hikes. Issue or not, the takeaway is that households are weaker than thought. It’s also a theme that appears to apply to the general employment claim data. 

Canada has seen an unusually large uptick in claims for employment insurance. It may be volumes we’ve seen before, but typically not outside of a recession. The rate of growth also implies momentum is picking up in the wrong direction.

The timing is also a bit of an issue. Claims are at recession volumes, but the unemployment rate is just above record lows. Tight labor markets usually don’t see rising claims and claim fraud. That leaves even more questions about the accuracy of the model used for unemployment data.



We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • questions guy 9 months ago

    when you don’t know, or can’t account, for about 1mm people in the country how can you possibly rely on unemployment numbers..?

  • Frank 9 months ago

    Very informative, it does soumd like the metrics used are skewed, sounds like we are already in a recession yet not according to the stats. Something is off, fudging numbers for what reason? Then again, whenever you hear ” I’m from the government, I’m here to help”, – run- .

    • Frank 9 months ago

      As well,higher for longer, if it’s anything like the Bank Of Canada’s Tiff Macklem saying interest rates will stay low for an extended time, then a rug pull.. why not do the same to investors believing ” higher for longer” ?

      • Dante 8 months ago

        Exactly, elections need to be won in the US and eventually here in Canada. Democrats and Liberals (with the same political agenda) are not going to blow up their respective economy when voters are going to the ballot box. Need to raise, in order to cut (print/pump).

      • Jay 8 months ago

        That’s the comments coming from the US FED – “Higher for Longer” is the new normal. And as we follow the US FED in IR decisions – it’s going to be a bumpy next 20 years to say the least.

  • CJ 9 months ago

    Is this trying to be actively misleading, or just not noticing that it’s profoundly misleading?

    Claims about the absolute numbers of claims, and comparing them to 15 years ago, are quietly ignoring that our population is significantly larger than it was 15 years ago.

    Use the percentages, not absolute numbers. The only reason to use absolute numbers, and to ignore that the overall population has gone up, is to obscure that the same absolute number is a lower percentage.

    Garbage clickbait.

    • Kate 8 months ago

      Nope, you just don’t understand that Canada’s shift to population growth based around temporary residency means they no longer count as unemployed, so the percentages don’t matter.

      It’s about the absolute claims when it comes to liabilities.

Comments are closed.