Canadian Building Permit Values Fell As Housing Demand Softens From Peak

Canadian future building construction intentions tapered as interest rates climbed, shows permit data. Statistics Canada (Stat Can) data shows the value of building permits, a leading indicator, made a small dive in March. Future building plans remain elevated compared to pre-2020. However, residential plans slowed as expected after record building activity.

Canadian Building Permit Values Fell 9% In March

Canadian building permits took a dip in the latest numbers. The value of building permits reached $11.7 billion in March, down 9.3% from a month before. While down, future building intentions remain 5.2% higher than last year — at least in dollar terms. The non-residential sector was behind the monthly drop. Annual growth was slowed by reduced plans for residential building.

Canadian Residential Building Permits Are 3% Lower Than Last Year

The monthly dollar value of residential permits climbed to a 12-month high. Permit values reached $7.9 billion in March, up 4.7% from the month before. Compared to last year, the value is 3.2% lower. Due to the building surge over the past couple of years combined with higher interest rates, a slowdown was widely expected this year. 

Canadian Future Building Intentions

The seasonally adjusted value of Canadian residential and non-residential building permits.

Source: Statistics Canada; Better Dwelling.

Non-Residential Construction Permit Values Remain Elevated, But With Noise From A Few Projects

Non-residential building is a much smaller segment, including commercial and institutional buildings. The value of permits for the segment climbed to $3.72 billion in March, down 29.5% from the month before. However, future building intentions are still up 28.9% from last year. The unusual monthly decline was from a temporary surge due to two hospitals, which drove the numbers higher in February. This segment didn’t see a boom over the past couple of years, so we’re mostly seeing a normalization of activity.

Future building intentions remain high, especially for non-residential buildings. Residential construction intentions are still higher than pre-2020 but show some signs of tapering. Low rates pulled forward demand while rising rates helped to push it out further. This year, at least one financial institution is forecasting new home starts will fall by a fifth.



We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • GTA Landlord 2 years ago

    and March is typically the peak for the year when it comes to demand. Definitely trending lower as home builders wait to see what happens.

  • Dennis_K 2 years ago

    I’m not clear on how the ‘value’ of building permits would be determined, but if the chart in the article actually reflects the number of housing units (or number of ‘housed persons’ the permits can accommodate), there’s two things that any slowdown or decrease in permits tells me (provided these do not reflect any pre-build sales). They are:

    a) the idea that we’re ‘behind’ in physical supply (in an overall sense, pan-nationally) is a myth — because if it were true, then building permit numbers would either be increasing or staying constant, in proportion to population growth (provided demand was rational – meaning, housing is being built only for resident citizens who need it); and

    b) that developers / builders will never build excess housing to the extent that prices would decline. They control the amount and rate of supply. They have the power to throttle (down) supply if they so choose, by simply slowing down the rate of building. It is simply not in their interest to ever build more than what is ‘demanded’.

Comments are closed.