Canadian Building Investment Falls Despite Public Incentives

Canadian building investment is falling despite a wave of public incentives aimed at boosting construction. Statistics Canada (StatCan) data shows building investment fell sharply in March. Now at a 5-month low, building investment pulled back as residential construction investment fell for a third straight month. Non-residential investment moved higher, but it wasn’t the usual sign of confidence. 

Canadian Building Investment Is Falling—Even Faster In Real Terms

Canadian building investment, seasonally adjusted in constant dollars.

Source: StatCan; Better Dwelling. 

Canadian building investment fell 1.3% (-$304.6 million) to $22.6 billion in March, down 2.9% (-$668.9 million) from last year. It was a 5-month low for investment, and the weakest March since 2024. The slowdown looks even worse in real terms, with inflation trimming 1.6% from March, putting it 6.4% below last year. The slowdown wasn’t just an odd skew observed in the monthly data either. 

The agency’s quarterly data reinforces the trend. Investment fell 0.7% in Q1, or 1.5% once adjusted for inflation. The decline was driven exclusively by residential investment, which more than offset the minor gain in non-residential.

Canadian Home Building Investment Plunging Despite Incentives

Canadian residential building investment, seasonally adjusted constant dollars. 

Source: StatCan; Better Dwelling. 

Residential building investment plunged 2.2% to $15.5 billion in March, moving lower for a third month. The lion’s share of the drop was due to a 2.3% drop in multi-family, with single-family falling 2.1% over the same period. The change in total isn’t far off from multi- or single-family’s decline, suggesting the erosion is broad-based. The disproportionate impact from multi-family was due to the investment concentration in the segment. 

Non-residential building investment climbed 0.6% to $7.0 billion in March. This area has been climbing steadily, with March coming in at the highest level since July 2020. Industrial (+3.3%) and commercial (+0.1%) both grew in March, while institutions fell 0.3%. Industrial and commercial are traditionally viewed as a positive. After all, this is usually private investment in places where people work and consume. StatCan didn’t identify the projects behind the increase, but it notes the concentration in B.C.’s industrial investment. This suggests the gain may reflect large project timing and public incentives rather than broad-based private-sector confidence. 

Canadian building investment is cooling even with significant incentives. The slowdown in residential is genuinely surprising, as taxpayers incentives pile up. Paired with home prices near highs in most provinces, the incentives are boosting profits—not supply. Non-residential investment presents a similar setup. This isn’t an economy drumming up investment due to the outlook, but instead the public buying activity. That’s not how an investment boom works. It’s how policymakers attempt to offset a downturn to keep people employed. 

4 Comments

COMMENT POLICY:

We encourage you to have a civil discussion. Note that reads "civil," which means don't act like jerks to each other. Still unclear? No name-calling, racism, or hate speech. Seriously, you're adults – act like it.

Any comments that violates these simple rules, will be removed promptly – along with your full comment history. Oh yeah, you'll also lose further commenting privileges. So if your comments disappear, it's not because the illuminati is screening you because they hate the truth, it's because you violated our simple rules.

  • Reply
    Gerry TK 2 weeks ago

    The newsletter is correct. These aren’t incentives to build, they’re offsets to NOT build anything.

    Wasn’t it you guys who pointed out the Ontario government provided incentives and it resulted in rising prices to price in the incentive?

  • Reply
    Ian Brown 2 weeks ago

    If you can double-dip into government building, why would anyone try to build at market?

    I didn’t think it could get worse than the gov changing “affordable” to mean higher than the current market rent in most cities to hand out money to developers, but here we are—they’re also securing the loans with taxpayer funds, and the bank regulator is openly allowing fraud. It’s crazy.

  • Reply
    M.Bury 2 weeks ago

    Slightly unrelated, I apologize, but I need an explanation from the seasoned RE agents here.

    I’ve seen this a few times. I’m following a specific listing (my old house). It lists on March 26 at said price, 54 days go by, no takers. Listing gets cancelled.
    A couple days later, relists at $30k higher.
    There is no modern economic theory to explain this, except madness. I’m confused.
    I was expecting it to be relisted at a much lower price to instigate a bidding war, but they went the other direction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *